Court Cases

Software Licensing Attorney: Oracle vs Google Decision.

Short answer: the Oracle v. Google API case told software companies that APIs and even functional code can be copyrightable, that these disputes are intensely fact-specific, and that proving copyrightability is far easier than proving infringement. On May 9, 2014, the appellate court handed down its 69-page decision in the

Read More »

Combination Exception Infringement

Short answer: your software infringement indemnity should cover only your software, not your software combined with the customer’s or a third party’s technology. In AFLAC v. Intervoice, the vendor owed no indemnity because the infringement claim arose from that combination. This is what to know about the “combination exception” to

Read More »

The $27 million SaaS NDA

A startup shared its trade secrets with a prospect that walked away and built a copycat. The NDA is what turned that into a $27 million judgment. Here is what to take from it.

Read More »

Tell Your Customer to Backup Their Data

Short answer: telling your customers to back up their data, in the contract, in the product, and in your documentation, is a cheap and genuinely effective legal defense. A Utah Supreme Court case shows that those customer data backup warnings, combined with a disclaimer of indirect damages, can get a

Read More »

2 Takeaways From the CarrierIQ Situation

Short answer: the CarrierIQ takeaways for software vendors come down to two things. In a vendor-plus-platform stack, the party that decides what data to collect and whether to disclose it carries the privacy responsibility. And a too-broad indemnity can put the software vendor on the hook for the platform’s mistakes.

Read More »

Can an IM Conversation Change a Written Contract?

Short answer: yes, an instant-message exchange can change a written contract. In one case, a vendor typed “NO LIMIT” and the other side replied “awesome,” and a federal court treated that as a binding modification, with no signature anywhere. IM contract modification is real, and it should change how your

Read More »

What You Should Not Do To Your Competitor

Short answer: the Oracle v. SAP case (a $1.3 billion jury verdict, later reduced to about $356.7 million) is a list of what not to do to a competitor: do not download more of their software than you are licensed for, do not ignore the terms of use on their

Read More »

Software OEM Agreement

Short answer: in a software OEM agreement you cannot grant your customers more rights than your own upstream license gives you. So spell out exactly what rights survive termination. A case where SAP was sued under an OEM agreement makes the point. Here are three things every software company can

Read More »

Free Initial Consultation

Get started with a free initial consultation. Fill out the form below to connect with our experts today!