3 Privacy Tips for a Software or SaaS Company(Courtesy of the US Supreme Court in 2010)
Well, while the US Supreme Court in its decision in the case of City of Ontario vs. Quon (June 17, 2010)–an employee privacy expectation case (actually, a sexting case involving a SWAT officer)–intentionally tried not to provide a lot of specific guidance, there are some take aways.
1) Computer/Technology Usage Policies Matter. The US Supreme Court seemed to make a big deal about the fact that that the computer policy in this situation was clearly communicated, as were changes to the policy (i.e. its applicability to text messages). Note to Self: Create policy and make sure we communicate material changes to all employees.
2) Intent of the Search Matters. In this instance, the employer initially performed the search to see if there was excessive use by the employee of the employer owned device (pager), as the employee was footing part of the bill. The court seemed to like the fact that the initial intent was related to the proper allocation of expenses between the employee and the government, so why the search is being performed is a big deal. Note to Self: Make sure that we have the right people involved in deciding on when and how to perform any type of employee data search (i.e. so that the search is performed for the right reasons and in the right way).
3) Managers Shouldn’t Try to Change Written Company …