Combination Exception Infringement
What to Know About the ‘Combination Exception’ to Infringement Indemnities.
As a software licensing attorney I run into the issue of infringement indemnities all the time. These risk shifting contractual clauses can be very confusing for clients, so I thought I would explain (with a real live case and a graphic) what is called the ‘combination claim exception.’
Contractual indemnities are in essence insurance policies, and the customer is asking for insurance if your software infringes (violates someone else’s IP rights). They expect that you will defend them (sometimes they even want to hire their own attorneys and send you the bill) in an infringement suit and pay any resulting judgment. This is a very common request from large customers.
However, there are typical exceptions to a software company’s indemnity obligation (i.e. risks that software companies should not be on the hook for). One of the most important exceptions is known as the ‘combination claim’ exception. The theory behind this exception is that your indemnity should only cover your software, and not your software + some other technology (either customer or third party). Look at it this way: Are you being compensated sufficiently in the transaction to pay for infringement insurance on how your customer uses your software or only on your software? Let’s take a look at a real world case from 2014.
The Facts: Intervoice’s software was deployed on premises at AFLAC and then AFLAC was sued for patent infringement. However, supposedly the Intervoice …