Tel 800.661.2530

  • Home
  • About Attorney
  • Testimonials
  • Mission
  • The Aber Law Difference
  • Contact

3 Privacy Tips for a Software or SAAS Company (Courtesy of the US Supreme Court in 2010)

Well, while the US Supreme Court in its decision in the case of City of Ontario vs. Quon (June 17, 2010)–an employee privacy expectation case (actually, a sexting case involving a SWAT officer)–intentionally tried not to provide a lot of specific guidance, there are some take aways.

1) Computer/Technology Usage Policies Matter. The US Supreme Court seemed to make a big deal about the fact that that the computer policy in this situation was clearly communicated, as were changes to the policy (i.e. its applicability to text messages). Note to Self: Create policy and make sure we communicate material changes to all employees.

2) Intent of the Search Matters.  In this instance, the employer initially performed the search to see if there was excessive use by the employee of the employer owned device (pager), as the employee was footing part of the bill. The court seemed to like the fact that the initial intent was related to the proper allocation of expenses between the employee and the government, so why the search is being performed is a big deal. Note to Self: Make sure that we have the right people involved in deciding on when and how to perform any type of employee data search (i.e. so that the search is performed for the right reasons and in the right way).

3) Managers Shouldn't Try to Change Written Company Policies. While you probably knew the general principle that managers should not change written policies–and most written policies actually state this–this was a huge issue in the case (in fact there would not have been a case if it were not for the allegation that the supervisor changed the written policy). At least the Supremes got this right, as they did not take the bait that the supervisor changed the policy. Note to Self: Remind HR to tell all mangers that if there is a question about our written policies, they should contact HR and not try to interpret the policy themselves.

Look I can go into a lot more detail (trust me) and give you a much longer list, but if you can remember these 3 takeaways you are dong great.  Give yourself some credit, as this is not one of the most exciting topics for any Software or SAAS business. However, you need to know at least the basics of the US Supreme Court's view of employee privacy in 2010.

Legal Disclaimer: This is for informational and educational purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

Related posts:

  1. Did You Know the US Supreme Court Changed Software and SAAS Distributor – Reseller Law in 2007? I bet you missed it, but I always look for...
  2. 3 ‘PRIVACY’ Takeaways from the Google Buzz FTC Settlement in March 2011 As you may have heard, Google settled with the Federal...
  3. Contract or Policy? Which One Does a Software Company Need and When! While this is a complex issue (like many legal issues),...

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

CAPTCHA Image
Refresh Image
*

ABOUT JEREMY ABER


Software Attorney

Contract, Copyright and Privacy Advice
Shorter & Plain English Agreements
Over 20 Years of Legal Experience

CONNECT WITH ME

  • Aber Law Firm on Twitter
  • Aber Law Firm on FaceBook
  • Aber Law Firm on LinkedIN
  • Aber Law Firm on RSS
  • Aber Law Firm on EMail
  • Aber Law Firm on Youtube
  • Email: Aber Law Firm
  • Phone: 800.661.2530

POPULAR BLOG POSTS

What Does Your Software EULA or Software as a Service Agreement Say About Your Company?

Enterprise Software Agreements: How to Design Yours!

SAAS Agreement vs. Software EULA. Which One Do I need?

6 Tips, If Your Customer Wants You to Use THEIR FORM AGREEMENT

CATEGORIES

  • Contracting (2)
  • Distributors (5)
  • Domain Names (1)
  • EULA (5)
  • FTC (1)
  • Government Contracting (1)
  • Marketing (2)
  • Pricing (1)
  • Privacy (3)
  • Resellers (6)
  • Reverse Engineering Software (1)
  • SAAS (19)
  • SAAS Contracts (5)
  • SAAS Finance (1)
  • SAAS Sales Compensation (1)
  • Sales Tax (2)
  • Software (26)
  • Software and SAAS Channel Agreements (3)
  • Software and SAAS Copyright Issues (9)
  • Software and SAAS Customer Negotiations (7)
  • Software and SAAS Revenue Recognition and Sales Tax Issues (4)
  • Software Development (3)
  • Software Licensing (7)
  • Software Litigation (8)
  • Software OEM (1)
  • Software Open Source Licensing (6)
  • Software Sales Compensation (1)
  • Trademarks (2)

USEFUL LINKS

  • Chanimal (Channel Programs)
  • Copyright General Information
  • OpenView Labs (Free Content)
  • OpenView Venture Partners (VC Firm)
  • SAAS Marketing Strategy
  • SAAS University Conferences
  • Sandhill (Great Free Content)
  • Software & SAAS AR Financing
  • Software Pricing Partners
  • Startups Market Development
Download vcard
  • Tel: 800.661.2530
  • Fax: 800.661.2388
  • Email: Aber Law Firm

Office Address:
901 South Mopac Expressway Barton Oaks Plaza One, Suite 300
Austin, TX 78746

© 2009-12 Jeremy Aber. All Rights Reserved. Represents clients in Austin, Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and nationwide on copyright law.
SAAS Contract SAAS Reseller Agreement Austin Software Attorney Houston Software Attorney Dallas Software Attorney Austin Copyright Attorney Software Negotiations SaaS Attorney SaaS Agreement

Developed by Wordpress Experts